Reference Notes
A curated set of long-form answers on entity setup, tax, land approvals and visa processes.
FAQ Index
Updated: 2026
These notes are written as practical reference material for investors and operators evaluating entity setup, tax exposure, land approvals and immigration processes in China.
Entity Types 01. Trading, manufacturing and service enterprises
RO Structure 02. Pros and cons of setting up a RO
Land Approval 03. Investment projects that require land
Tax Analysis 04. Tax obligations of an offshore consultancy firm
Structure Choice 05. Why investors choose RO and FIPE
01
A practical comparison of operational scope, tax treatment and registration expectations across three common enterprise models.
OPERATIONS
TAXES
COMPANY REGISTRATION
Under the Company Law, the minimum registered-capital requirement for a multi-shareholder limited liability company was reduced to RMB 1 from March 1, 2014. Single-shareholder companies, sole proprietorships, partnerships and certain regulated industries remain subject to their own rules.
In practical terms, recommended capital levels still depend on local policy, operational requirements, the intended business model and ease of registration. We generally use the following benchmarks:
Where no board structure is used, the company will usually need at least one executive director and one supervisor. The executive director may also act as general manager and usually serves as legal representative.
02
A Representative Office may appear light and accessible, but its operational constraints and tax consequences are often underestimated.
We often see smaller foreign firms, and in some cases individual operators, consider a RO instead of a WFOE. For some, the attraction is the absence of so-called "registered capital". For others, a RO appears less risky and less demanding than a WFOE.
In practice, however, the main disadvantages are easier to understand as a short checklist:
7. To set up a RO, the foreign company usually needs to show two years of continuous operation in its home jurisdiction. Incorporating a WFOE does not impose the same threshold. If, for example, a company has only been established in Hong Kong for one year, it may still pursue a WFOE immediately, whereas a RO application may need to wait until the two-year requirement has been satisfied.
03
Land-use approvals involve different review paths depending on project size, funding source and local policy treatment.
Land is state-owned in China. Applying for the right to use land involves substantial documentation and can be a lengthy administrative process. Different investment projects fall into three broad documentation categories.
The approval path usually falls into one of three categories:
The thresholds for what constitutes a large project or a restricted investment differ by province and city. For example, a real-estate project may only require record filing in one jurisdiction while requiring formal review in another. The documentation burden therefore depends heavily on local policy.
It is also important not to assume that the process ends with these headline documents. Additional supporting materials are often required for each category of investment, and the wider land-use approval process can extend well beyond the initial filing stage.
In some cases, approval may take two to three years. For certain industries, leasing premises rather than applying for land rights may offer a faster route into operation. In other sectors, however, land approval remains unavoidable. The applicable rules may also be adjusted from time to time to reflect foreign-investment incentives.
04
The core issue is whether the offshore entity may be treated as a permanent establishment in China, and how that changes tax exposure.
We have seen growing interest from both foreign nationals in China and Chinese nationals in using Hong Kong companies for consultancy activities. The practical question is usually not whether the offshore company exists, but whether its work in China creates taxable presence and personal-tax exposure.
Case I
A Chinese professional, X, has incorporated a Hong Kong company, ABC, of which he is the sole shareholder and sole director.
Scenario 1
X resides in China for most of the year but does not register a Mainland company or representative office for ABC. He works intermittently on separate projects in China, and the fees are remitted to ABC's Hong Kong corporate account.
Outcome
Scenario 2
X is effectively working on one continuing China project, even if there are breaks in timing between work stages.
Outcome
Scenario 3
X asks clients to remit fees directly to his personal account in China in order to avoid the complexity of Scenario 2.
Outcome
Case II
A foreign professional, Y, such as an American consultant, lives in Guangzhou for more than six months but less than one year. He has incorporated a Hong Kong company, DEF, of which he is the sole shareholder and sole director. DEF serves both Chinese clients and US clients.
Scenario 1
DEF is not treated as having a taxable presence in China, and its profits are not sourced in Hong Kong.
Outcome
Scenario 2
DEF is treated as carrying on a taxable project in China, and Y is paid by DEF for the China work.
Outcome
Scenario 3
Y receives China-project income personally and fails to report it properly.
Outcome
05
The choice is often driven by capital constraints, immigration needs, operational flexibility and varying tolerance for compliance complexity.
We often receive enquiries about setting up a WFOE, RO, JV or FIPE. In some cases, however, the investor does not explain the underlying business line or investment scale, which makes it difficult to give advice tailored to the actual situation. Without that basic context, it is hard to recommend the right structure with confidence.
Some foreign nationals consider a RO because it may support Z-visa applications or residence-permit renewals and allows them to remain in China on a more stable legal basis. A RO is often seen as easier and less expensive to establish because it does not require paid-in capital, and some investors assume that it also involves lighter tax and management burdens than a WFOE. That assumption is not always correct.
In many cases, the foreign investor is using a single-shareholder or closely held company, sometimes incorporated in Hong Kong, and may appoint himself, herself or a family member as chief representative. The practical objective may be to create a lawful basis to live and work in China while keeping the structure relatively inexpensive and straightforward.
FIPE structures, by contrast, are often chosen by smaller investors who still want to operate through a legitimate commercial entity rather than carrying on business informally under the cover of a RO. For clients with limited capital but genuine operating needs, FIPE can offer a more appropriate path.
The right recommendation depends on candid disclosure of the investor's business model, budget, staffing needs and immigration objectives. Without that information, structural advice is likely to miss the mark.
06
A step-by-step outline of the usual employment-licence, visa-entry and residence-permit sequence for foreign nationals.
We are occasionally asked to provide visa guidance alongside broader market-entry work. The summary below is intended as a practical reference, even though our main work remains focused on feasibility analysis and investment advisory rather than immigration processing alone.
Scenario I
If your spouse plans to join you in China for family reunion, a separate application can generally be made through the relevant Chinese embassy or consulate, provided your status in China is properly documented.
Scenario II
Q&A
Question: "I will be working for a Chinese company in Shanghai for several years. How can my spouse join me in China from Country X?"
Answer: Prepare copies of your employment permit, residence permit and employment contract, together with a letter of invitation, and send them to your spouse. Your spouse will also usually need the marriage certificate, or a notarised copy if required. The application can then be filed with the relevant Chinese embassy or consulate in Country X.
07
The distinction between registration time and full formation time is critical when setting realistic expectations.
It is common for different agencies to quote different timelines. In general, foreign agencies tend to provide longer estimates than local Chinese agencies.
There is an important distinction between registration time and formation time.
Formation time is therefore inevitably longer than registration time alone.
The longest formation timeline we have encountered was approximately six months. In that case, the overseas parent company had instructed a Hong Kong law firm, which likely delegated the operational work onward to another agency. Once several intermediaries are involved, coordination delays become far more likely. In those situations, credibility and perceived reliability are often prioritised over speed.
Why, then, do foreign agencies often quote longer timelines than local Chinese agencies?
There are several possible reasons:
As a practical benchmark, our standard processing time for the registration stage alone is 30 working days, assuming the client has already prepared the required documents.
Some agencies may quote shorter timelines, such as 20 to 25 working days, but we are generally reluctant to compress the process beyond a level we consider dependable.
Document notarisation and consularisation time can vary depending on the country in which the parent company is located. Internal document-preparation time also differs significantly from one client to another.
On that basis, 60 working days, or roughly two and a half months, should be viewed as the minimum practical threshold for forming a RO. A more comfortable and typical timeline is 90 working days, or around four months. If the overall timeframe extends materially beyond that, there should usually be a specific reason.